4.7 Article

Effects of curvature radius on separation behaviors of the hydrocyclone with a tangent-circle inlet

期刊

POWDER TECHNOLOGY
卷 305, 期 -, 页码 156-165

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.powtec.2016.10.002

关键词

Hydrocyclone; Tangent-circle inlet; Curvature radius; Computational fluid dynamics (CFD); Flow field; Pressure drop

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [51474054, 51504054]
  2. Fund of State Key Laboratory of Mineral Processing [BGRIMM-KJSKL-2015-04]
  3. Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities [N140105002, N130301003]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

An appropriate design of the inlet type has been proved to be an effective approach to improve the performance of a hydrocyclone. Until now, there is still no detail analysis on the mechanism underlying the flow control by the inlet type. In this paper, numerical simulation was conducted to investigate effects of curvature radius on the separation performance of the hydrocydone with a tangent-circle inlet The validity of the approach was verified by the reasonably good agreement between the predicted and measured results in terms of water velocities and particle partition curves. The simulating results were further analyzed in aspects of the flow field, pressure drop and separation performance. Results showed that a smaller curvature radius could increase the tangential velocity and the pressure gradient. Besides, the turbulence kinetic energy in the inlet section and the annular section are reduced by decreasing the curvature radius. Meanwhile, the symmetry of the inner flow field was improved by reducing the curvature radius. All these factors enhanced the radial regular distribution of parades in the inlet section and reduced influences of the short circuit flow on relatively coarse particles. Therefore, the classification precision was improved when using a tangent-circle inlet with a smaller curvature radius compared with base hydrocyclone. (C) 2016 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据