4.7 Article

Numerical study of a fluid catalytic cracking regenerator hydrodynamics

期刊

POWDER TECHNOLOGY
卷 305, 期 -, 页码 662-672

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.powtec.2016.09.082

关键词

FCC regenerator; CFD; Eulerian; Drag model; Hydrodynamics

资金

  1. BP Refining and Logistics Technology

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Fluid catalytic cracking (FCC) is one of the most important conversion processes in petroleum refineries, and FCC regenerator is a key component of an FCC unit to recover the solid catalyst reactivity by burning off the deposited coke on the catalyst. In this paper, a three-dimensional multi-phase flow computational fluid dynamics (CFD) model was established to simulate the flow inside a commercial FCC regenerator. The two phases involved in the flow are gas phase and solid phase. The Eulerian-Eulerian approach, where the two phases are considered to be continuous and fully inter-penetrating, was employed. The effects of different drag models on the flow characteristics were firstly investigated. A modified drag force model was applied by using user define function (UDF) in ANSYS Fluent, which provides a better prediction on the solid volume fraction profile along the regenerator height. Particle clustering phenomena was taken into consideration through the adjustment of effective particle cluster diameters. The appropriate effective cluster diameters in the dense bed and the dilute phase are 300 pm and 200 pm, respectively. Catalyst solid volume fraction profile indicates that there are four zones in the computational domain: dense zone, sub-dense zone, dilute zone and sub-dilute zone. The developed CFD model was validated by plant data. The effect of air superficial velocity on the fluidization was also investigated and the results shown that the total flow rate of catalysts goes through the cyclone increases linearly with increasing air superficial velocity from a range of 0.6 to 1.03. (C) 2016 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据