4.7 Article

Effects of copper ions on the characteristics of egg white gel induced by strong alkali

期刊

POULTRY SCIENCE
卷 96, 期 11, 页码 4116-4123

出版社

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.3382/ps/pex213

关键词

copper ions; alkali treatment; egg white gel; molecular force; sulphhydryl groups

资金

  1. Program of the National Natural Science Foundation of China [31460400, 31360398]
  2. Science and Technology Project of Jiangxi Province, China [20151BBF60022]
  3. Young Scientist Training Objects Program of Jiangxi Province, China [20153BCB23028]
  4. Outstanding Youth Talent Funded Projects Program of Jiangxi Province, China [20162BCB23031]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study investigated the effects of copper ions on egg white (EW) gel induced by strong alkali. Changes in gel characteristics were examined through texture profile analysis, scanning electron microscopy (SEM), and chemical methods. The value of gel strength reached its maximum when 0.1% copper ions was added. However, the lowest cohesiveness values were observed at 0.1%. The springiness of gel without copper ions was significantly greater than the gel with copper ions added. SEM results illustrated that the low concentration of copper ions contributes to a dense and uniform gel network, and an open matrix was formed at 0.4%. The free and total sulphhydryl group content in the egg white protein gel significantly decreased with the increased copper. The increase of copper ions left the contents of ionic and hydrogen bonds basically unchanged, hydrophobic interaction presented an increasing trend, and the disulfide bond exhibited a completely opposite change. The change of surface hydrophobicity proved that the main binding force of copper induced gel was hydrophobic interaction. However, copper ions had no effect on the protein component of the gels. Generally, a low level of copper ions facilitates proteinprotein association, which is involved in the characteristics of gels. Instead, high ionic strength had a negative effect on gels induced by strong alkali.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据