4.8 Article

The synergistic toxicity of the multiple chemical mixtures: Implications for risk assessment in the terrestrial environment

期刊

ENVIRONMENT INTERNATIONAL
卷 77, 期 -, 页码 95-105

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.envint.2015.01.014

关键词

Insecticides; Herbicides; Heavy metal; Eisenia fetida; Acute mixture toxicity; Combination index

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [31401767]
  2. Science and Technology Innovation Program of the Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences
  3. Innovation Project of the Zhejiang Academy of Agricultural Sciences [2014CX010]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The combined toxicity of five insecticides (chlorpyrifos, avermectin, imidacloprid, lambda-cyhalothrin, and phoxim), two herbicides (atrazine and butachlor) and a heavy metal (cadmium) has been examined with the earthworm acute toxicity test. Toxicological interactions of these chemicals in four, five, six, seven, and eight-component mixtures were studied using the combination-index (Cl) equation method. In four-component and five-component mixtures, the synergistic effects predominated at lower effect levels, while the patterns of interactions found in six, seven, and eight-component mixtures displayed synergism. The lambda-CY + IMI + BUT + ATR + CPF + PHO combination displayed the most strongly synergistic interaction, with CI values ranging from 0.09 to 0.15. The nature of the interaction changes with the effect level and the relevance of synergistic effects increase with the complexity of the mixture. The CI method was compared with the classical models of concentration addition (CA) and independent action (IA) and we found that the CI method could accurately predict the combined toxicity. The predicted synergism resulted from co-existence of the pesticides and the heavy metal especially at low effect levels may have important implications in risk assessment for the real terrestrial environment. (C) 2015 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据