4.8 Review

Ecotoxicological assessment of antibiotics: A call for improved consideration of microorganisms

期刊

ENVIRONMENT INTERNATIONAL
卷 85, 期 -, 页码 189-205

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.envint.2015.09.013

关键词

Antimicrobials; Ecosystem services; Ecotoxicology; Environmental risk assessment; Microbial ecology; Pharmaceuticals

资金

  1. Canadian Society of Microbiologists
  2. AstraZeneca Global Safety, Health and Environment
  3. Pfizer Animal Health
  4. F. Hoffman-La Roche Ltd.
  5. GlaxoSmithKline
  6. Unilever
  7. Huvepharma
  8. American Cleaning Institute
  9. Canadian Animal Health Institute
  10. German Federal Ministry for the Environment, Nature Conservation, Building and Nuclear Safety
  11. Health Canada
  12. Public Health Agency of Canada
  13. Center for Environmental and Agricultural Microbiology (CREAM)
  14. Villum Foundation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Antibiotics play a pivotal role in the management of infectious disease in humans, companion animals, livestock, and aquaculture operations at a global scale. Antibiotics are produced, consumed, and released into the environment at an unprecedented scale causing concern that the presence of antibiotic residues may adversely impact aquatic and terrestrial ecosystems. Here we critically review the ecotoxicological assessment of antibiotics as related to environmental risk assessment (ERA). We initially discuss the need for more specific protection goals based on the ecosystem service concept, and suggest that the ERA of antibiotics, through the application of a mode of toxic action approach, should make more use of ecotoxicological endpoints targeting microorganisms (especially bacteria) and microbial communities. Key ecosystem services provided by microorganisms and associated ecosystem service-providing units (e.g. taxa or functional groups) are identified. Approaches currently available for elucidating ecotoxicological effects on microorganisms are reviewed in detail and we conclude that microbial community-based tests should be used to complement single-species tests to offer more targeted protection of key ecosystem services. Specifically, we propose that ecotoxicological tests should not only assess microbial community function, but also microbial diversity ('species' richness) and antibiotic susceptibility. Promising areas for future basic and applied research of relevance to ERA are highlighted throughout the text. In this regard, the most fundamental knowledge gaps probably relate to our rudimentary understanding of the ecological roles of antibiotics in nature and possible adverse effects of environmental pollution with subinhibitory levels of antibiotics. (C) 2015 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据