4.6 Article

Evaluation of major heat waves' mechanisms in EURO-CORDEX RCMs over Central Europe

期刊

CLIMATE DYNAMICS
卷 50, 期 11-12, 页码 4249-4262

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s00382-017-3873-9

关键词

Heat waves; Regional climate models; CORDEX; Atmospheric circulation; Land-atmosphere interactions; Central Europe

资金

  1. Czech Science Foundation [16-22000S]
  2. Ministry of Education, Youth and Sports of the Czech Republic within the National Sustainability Program I (NPU I) [LO1415]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The main aim of the study is to evaluate the capability of EURO-CORDEX regional climate models (RCMs) to simulate major heat waves in Central Europe and their associated meteorological factors. Three reference major heat waves (1994, 2006, and 2015) were identified in the E-OBS gridded data set, based on their temperature characteristics, length and spatial extent. Atmospheric circulation, precipitation, net shortwave radiation, and evaporative fraction anomalies during these events were assessed using the ERA-Interim reanalysis. The analogous major heat waves and their links to the aforementioned factors were analysed in an ensemble of EURO-CORDEX RCMs driven by various global climate models in the 1970-2016 period. All three reference major heat waves were associated with favourable circulation conditions, precipitation deficit, reduced evaporative fraction and increased net shortwave radiation. This joint contribution of large-scale circulation and land-atmosphere interactions is simulated with difficulties in majority of the RCMs, which affects the magnitude of modelled major heat waves. In some cases, the seemingly good reproduction of major heat waves' magnitude is erroneously achieved through extremely favourable circulation conditions compensated by a substantial surplus of soil moisture or vice versa. These findings point to different driving mechanisms of major heat waves in some RCMs compared to observations, which should be taken into account when analysing and interpreting future projections of these events.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据