3.8 Article

Mosaic capillaroscopic findings in systemic sclerosis

期刊

WIENER MEDIZINISCHE WOCHENSCHRIFT
卷 168, 期 9-10, 页码 248-249

出版社

SPRINGER WIEN
DOI: 10.1007/s10354-018-0617-3

关键词

Capillaroscopy; Systemic sclerosis/scleroderma; Mosaic pattern; Microangiopathy; Endothelial damage

资金

  1. EULAR grant

向作者/读者索取更多资源

A 67-year-old woman with triphasic Raynaud's phenomenon since 2 years was diagnosed as having limited cutaneous systemic sclerosis (SSc) 1 year ago based on puffy fingers, positive antinuclear and anti-Scl-70 autoantibodies, and initial pulmonary fibrosis. Capillaroscopic examination revealed mosaic capillaroscopic findings that included normal pattern; scleroderma-type capillaroscopic pattern early phase, with single giant capillaries and haemorrhages, preserved capillary distribution; and scleroderma-type capillaroscopic pattern active phase, with high number of giant capillary loops and haemorrhages, moderately disturbed distribution. Nailfold capillaroscopy is an established non-invasive imaging technique for morphologic evaluation of the capillaries in the nail-fold area that reveals diagnostic changes in the majority of SSc patients. It has been included in the recently published EULAR/ACR (European League Against Rheumatism/American College of Rheumatology) classification criteria for SSc (2013). The generalized microangiopathy is a cardinal feature of SSc, but the underlying endothelial damage of the capillaries varies in the different compartments of the body, sometimes even within the same organ. As typical capillaroscopic findings are diagnostic in clinical context, this case of a mosaic pattern should remind the clinicians that the capillaroscopic examination should be performed for the eight fingers bilaterally (excluding the thumbs because of poor visibility), in order to detect the presence of all types and grades of pathological microvascular changes to facilitate the highest diagnostic accuracy.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

3.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据