4.6 Article

Atmospheric conditions and weather regimes associated with extreme winter dry spells over the Mediterranean basin

期刊

CLIMATE DYNAMICS
卷 50, 期 11-12, 页码 4437-4453

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s00382-017-3884-6

关键词

Extreme dry spells; Wet season; Mediterranean; Atmospheric conditions; Weather regimes; HyMeX

资金

  1. HYdrological cycle in The Mediterranean EXperiment (HyMeX) program through INSU-MISTRALS support

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Very long dry spell events occurring during winter are natural hazards to which the Mediterranean region is extremely vulnerable, because they can lead numerous impacts for environment and society. Four dry spell patterns have been identified in a previous work. Identifying the main associated atmospheric conditions controlling the dry spell patterns is key to better understand their dynamics and their evolution in a changing climate. Except for the Levant region, the dry spells are generally associated with anticyclonic blocking conditions located about 1000 km to the Northwest of the affected area. These anticyclonic conditions are favourable to dry spell occurrence as they are associated with subsidence of cold and dry air coming from boreal latitudes which bring low amount of water vapour and non saturated air masses, leading to clear sky and absence of precipitation. These extreme dry spells are also partly related to the classical four Euro-Atlantic weather regimes are: the two phases of the North Atlantic Oscillation, the Scandinavian blocking or East-Atlantic, and the Atlantic ridge. Only the The East-Atlantic, Atlantic ridge and the positive phase of the North Atlantic Oscillation are frequently associated with extremes dry spells over the Mediterranean basin but they do not impact the four dry spell patterns equally. Finally long sequences of those weather regimes are more favourable to extreme dry spells than short sequences. These long sequences are associated with the favourable prolonged and reinforced anticyclonic conditions.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据