期刊
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RISK & SAFETY IN MEDICINE
卷 29, 期 3-4, 页码 193-205出版社
IOS PRESS
DOI: 10.3233/JRS-180028
关键词
Carcinogenicity; conflicts of interest; ghostwriting; genotoxicity; glyphosate; herbicides; Intertek; key opinion leaders; Monsanto; non-Hodgkins lymphoma; third parties; Roundup
OBJECTIVE: Examination of de-classified Monsanto documents from litigation in order to expose the impact of the company's efforts to influence the reporting of scientific studies related to the safety of the herbicide, glyphosate. METHODS: A set of 141 recently de-classified documents, made public during the course of pending toxic tort litigation, In Re Roundup Products Liability Litigation were examined. RESULTS: The documents reveal Monsanto-sponsored ghostwriting of articles published in toxicology journals and the lay media, interference in the peer review process, behind-the-scenes influence on retraction and the creation of a so-called academic website as a front for the defense of Monsanto products. CONCLUSION: The use of third-party academics in the corporate defense of glyhphosate reveals that this practice extends beyond the corruption of medicine and persists in spite of efforts to enforce transparency in industry manipulation.
作者
我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。
推荐
暂无数据