4.7 Article

Influence of weathering on visual and surface aspect of wood plastic composites: Correlation approach with mechanical properties and microstructure

期刊

POLYMER DEGRADATION AND STABILITY
卷 137, 期 -, 页码 162-172

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.polymdegradstab.2017.01.010

关键词

Wood flour; Weathering; Color; Roughness; Mechanical properties; Principal Component Analysis

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study aims to assess and understand simultaneously the changes in visual aspect, surface topography and mechanical properties of a wood flour reinforced polypropylene (PP) composite under natural and artificial weathering conditions. Compounds were produced through twin-screw extrusion followed by injection molding in order to obtain dog bone samples. A one-year natural outdoor exposure and a xenon-arc accelerated weathering were studied. As expected, mechanical performances are decreased under UV exposure. This performance degradation goes along with important changes in visual aspect. In addition to commonly used microscopy observations, other methods such as colorimetry, spectrogoniometry and confocal rugosimetry are used to characterize the surface aspect through color, gloss and roughness properties. These analyses revealed that ageing induces a surface bleaching, a wood particle protrusion and numerous micro-cracks. Moreover the chain scission attested by Size Exclusion Chromatography (SEC) and lixiviation on the surface induces roughness and gloss loss. Otherwise biocomposites were more degraded under natural weathering. This paper gives new insights in understanding how weathering affects physico-mechanical properties of wood plastic composites (WPC). For that, the Principal Component Analysis (PCA) gives global overview about effects of type of weathering and wood rate on physical, mechanical and chemical properties by calculating their contributions to the drawing of axes (Principal Components) during PCA. (C) 2017 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据