4.7 Article

Carbazole-based copolymers via direct arylation polymerization (DArP) for Suzuki-convergent polymer solar cell performance

期刊

POLYMER CHEMISTRY
卷 8, 期 30, 页码 4393-4402

出版社

ROYAL SOC CHEMISTRY
DOI: 10.1039/c7py00859g

关键词

-

资金

  1. National Science Foundation [CHE-1608891]
  2. Dornsife/Graduate School
  3. Villum Foundation Young Investigator Program

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Although direct arylation polymerization (DArP) has recently emerged as an alternative to traditional cross-coupling methods like Suzuki polymerization, the evaluation of DArP polymers in practical applications like polymer solar cells (PSCs) is limited. Because even the presence of minute quantities of defects can dramatically influence the solar cell, performance of DArP polymers offers critical insight alongside other structural and optoelectronic comparisons. Even via traditional methods, carbazolebased donors are frequently prone to homocoupling defects, which has been shown to-along with beta-defects-compromise performance. Through defect minimization with the bulky and affordable neodecanoic acid (NDA) mixture, we report the synthesis of DArP poly[(9-(heptadecan-9-yl)-9H-carbazole)alt-( 4,7-di(thiophen-2-yl) benzo[c][1,2,5] thiadiazole)] (PCDTBT) that outperforms Suzuki PCDTBT with similar molecular weights. Expanding beyond this model system, carbazole-based polymers featuring 2,5diethylhexyl- 3,6-di(thiophen-2-yl)-2,5-dihydropyrrolo[3,4-c] pyrrole-1,4-dione (DPP), 4,10-bis(diethylhexyl)- thieno[2', 3': 5,6] pyrido[3,4-g] thieno[3,2-c] isoquinoline-5,11-dione (TPTI), 5-octyl-1,3-di(thiophen2- yl)-4H-thieno[3,4-c] pyrrole-4,6(5H)-dione (DT-TPD), and 2,5-bis(2,3-dihydrothieno[3,4-b][1,4] dioxin5- yl) pyridine (EDOT-Pyr) are generated. Polymers are characterized by H-1 NMR, cyclic voltammetry, UV-Vis, GIXRD, SCLC hole mobilities, and are implemented into polymer solar cells fabricated in air under ambient humidity. We demonstrate that DArP polymers perform comparably to Suzuki in practical applications.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据