4.6 Article

Multiscale Entropy Analysis of Heart Rate Variability for Assessing the Severity of Sleep Disordered Breathing

期刊

ENTROPY
卷 17, 期 1, 页码 231-243

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/e17010231

关键词

multiscale entropy; scale factor; obstructive sleep dyspnea; polysomnography; heart rate variability

资金

  1. National Science Council, Taiwan, R.O.C. [102-2221-E-259-004, NSC 102-2221-E-008-008, NSC 102-2911-1-008-001]
  2. CGH [CNJRF-101CGH-NCU-A4, VGHUST103-G1-3-3]
  3. NCU [CNJRF-101CGH-NCU-A4, VGHUST103-G1-3-3]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) is an independent cardiovascular risk factor to which autonomic nervous dysfunction has been reported to be an important contributor. Ninety subjects recruited from the sleep center of a single medical center were divided into four groups: normal snoring subjects without OSA (apnea hypopnea index, AHI < 5, n = 11), mild OSA (5 <= AHI < 15, n = 10), moderate OSA (15 <= AHI < 30, n = 24), and severe OSA (AHI >= 30, n = 45). Demographic (i.e., age, gender), anthropometric (i.e., body mass index, neck circumference), and polysomnographic (PSG) data were recorded and compared among the different groups. For each subject, R-R intervals (RRI) from 10 segments of 10-minute electrocardiogram recordings during non-rapid eye movement sleep at stage N2 were acquired and analyzed for heart rate variability (HRV) and sample entropy using multiscale entropy index (MEI) that was divided into small scale (MEISS, scale 1-5) and large scale (MEILS, scale 6-10). Our results not only demonstrated that MEISS could successfully distinguish normal snoring subjects and those with mild OSA from those with moderate and severe disease, but also revealed good correlation between MEISS and AHI with Spearman correlation analysis (r = -0.684, p < 0.001). Therefore, using the two parameters of EEG and ECG, MEISS may serve as a simple preliminary screening tool for assessing the severity of OSA before proceeding to PSG analysis.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据