4.7 Article

Porous lignin based poly (acrylic acid)/organo-montmorillonite nanocomposites: Swelling behaviors and rapid removal of Pb (II) ions

期刊

POLYMER
卷 128, 期 -, 页码 12-23

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.polymer.2017.09.009

关键词

Porous; Lignin based poly (acrylic acid); OMMT; Pb2+ absorption

资金

  1. Heilongjiang Province Science Foundation for Youths [QC2014C011]
  2. Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities [2572017CB14]
  3. Harbin Special Funds to Innovative Talents on Science and Technology Research Project [RC2016QN017026]
  4. University of Tennessee
  5. ACS Petroleum Research Fund [53930-ND6]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Lignin grafted N, N'-methylene-bisacrylamide (LM) was copolymerized with acrylic acid (AA) to fabricate lignin based poly (acrylic acid) (LBPAA) nanocomposites, and organo-montmorillonite (OrgMMT) was uniformly dispersed in LBPAA by ultrasonic method. The water absorbency in KCl solution was 302.9 g/g for LBPAA/OrgMMT (3 wt% OrgMMT, 43.65 wt% LM, and 53.35 wt% poly(acrylic acid) (PAA)), higher than PAA/OrgMMT (104.5736 g/g), and PAA (131.8 g/g). The Pb2+ adsorption for LBPAA/OrgMMT was demonstrated to be pH-dependent and followed Freundlich multilayer adsorption, with the removal following a pseudo-second-order kinetic model. The Pb2+ absorption capacity of LBPAA (PAA 48.50/48.50 LM)/OrgMMT (3 wt%) was 1.0803 mmol.g(-1), the highest among the composites. When the mole ratio of Na+ and Pb2+ was less than 0.21, the Pb2+ adsorption capacity of LBPAA/OrgMMT decreased slightly. The negative Delta G(0) indicated that the Pb2+ adsorption process for composite hydrogel and PAA was spontaneous. XPS analysis data indicated that Pb2+ ions formed Pb-O bonds by hydroxyl groups and carboxyl groups for efficient lead ion adsorption. This study demonstrates that LBPAA/OrgMMT can be used as a water retention agent with salt tolerance and as an adsorbent for removing Pb2+ ions from industrial waste water. (C) 2017 Published by Elsevier Ltd.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据