4.7 Article

Selective distribution and migration of carbon nanotubes enhanced electrical and mechanical performances in polyolefin elastomers

期刊

POLYMER
卷 110, 期 -, 页码 1-11

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.polymer.2016.12.056

关键词

Double percolation; Reduced percolation threshold; Electrical conductivity

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China (NNSFC) [51422305, 51421061]
  2. Major State Basic Research Development Program of China (973 program) [2012CB025902]
  3. Sichuan Provincial Science Fund for Distinguished Young Scholars [2015JQ0003]
  4. State Key Laboratory of Polymer Materials Engineering [sklpme2014-2-02]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

A thermodynamic and kinetic method based on the selective distribution and migration of multi-walled carbon nanotubes (MWCNTs) in polyoxyethylene (PEO)/ethylene-alpha-octene random copolymer (ORC) composite system was reported to improve the dispersion of MWCNTs in ORC. Scanning electron micrographs and transmission electron micrographs confirmed that MWCNTs could almost completely migrate from the PEO phase to the ORC phase during melt compounding and lead to tremendously improved dispersion of 1VIWCNT5 in ORC, compared with traditional melt compounded ORC/MWCNT composites. Rheological analysis revealed that better MWCNTs network was developed at a lower content of MWCNTs with an improved dispersion of MWCNTs in ORC. The percolation threshold was drastically reduced from 3.82 to 035 vol % and the electrical conductivity was tremendously improved. The mechanical properties were also fully enhanced in comparison with traditional melt compounded ORC/MWCNT composites owing to the homogeneous dispersion of MWCNTs. These results manifest that, by proper selection of components with a selective distribution of MWCNTs and controlling the migration process of MWCNTs in the composites, the dispersion of MWCNT5 in polymer matrix and resulting performance of the nanocomposites can be greatly improved. (C) 2016 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据