4.5 Article

Recovery of Neodymium as (Na, Nd)(SO4)2 from the Ferrous Fraction of a General WEEE Shredder Stream

期刊

JOURNAL OF SUSTAINABLE METALLURGY
卷 4, 期 2, 页码 276-287

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s40831-018-0165-5

关键词

WEEE recycling; Neodymium; Rare earth elements; Secondary resources; Rare earth recycling

资金

  1. EU project FP7 REEcover [603564]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Neodymium is a critical element used in many high-tech applications. However, despite this, the EU is entirely dependent on China for its Nd supply. This has driven the EU to develop recycling strategies to recover its Nd from end-of-life (EoL) products and wastes, and establish a domestic supply. This paper proposes a process to recycle Nd from NdFeB magnet particles present in the ferrous fraction of shredded Waste Electrical and Electronic Equipment (WEEE), after physical upgrading. This WEEE fraction represents a waste stream that has not been previously considered a source of Nd. A three-step process was developed. First, the upgraded ferrous WEEE fraction is oxidized by means of water corrosion. Second, the oxidized WEEE is leached with diluted H2SO4 to selectively extract Nd and other nonferrous elements. And finally, the leach liquor is treated with Na2SO4 to precipitate the Nd as its double sulfate (Nd, Na)(SO4)(2). The oxidation process oxidizes 93% of the metallic iron to Fe(OH)(3), leaving 7% of the iron unoxidized. The leaching process dissolves between 70 and 99% of the Nd, depending on the temperature and liquid/solid ratio (L/S); this is accompanied by an iron coextraction between 9 and 20%. The precipitation recovers 92% of the leached Nd. The purity of the obtained precipitates is dependent on the pH at which the precipitation takes place. A pH below 0.5 is required to prevent Fe contamination, and a pH below 0 reduces the Ca contamination to below 1 wt%. The developed process provides an effective and low-cost method to recycle Nd from a shredded WEEE stream with an overall Nd recovery of over 90%.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据