4.7 Article

Mesoporous nitrogen-doped carbons from PAN-based molecular bottlebrushes

期刊

POLYMER
卷 126, 期 -, 页码 352-359

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.polymer.2017.03.040

关键词

Polyacrylonitrile; Polymer brushes; Block copolymers; Oxygen reduction; Nitrogen-doped carbon

资金

  1. National Science Foundation [DMR 1501324, DMR 1436219]
  2. National Science Center, Poland [2014/14/A/ST5/0020]
  3. Polish Ministry of Science and Higher Education (Mobilnosc Plus grant) [1055/MOB/2013/0]
  4. Direct For Mathematical & Physical Scien
  5. Division Of Materials Research [1501324] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Densely grafted brushes with poly(n-butyl acrylate)-block-polyacrylonitrile (PBA-b-PAN) block copolymers (BCPs) as side chains were synthesized by atom transfer radical polymerization (ATRP) using a grafting from technique. Owing to the covalent linkage of the arms to the backbone and the resulting strong steric repulsion between the BCP side chains, these bottlebrushes successfully overcame the partial miscibility problem existing in most BCPs at low degrees of polymerization (DP). PBA-b-PAN bottlebrushes were then pyrolyzed to form porous nitrogen-doped carbons using a two-step thermal treatment: first forming intermolecular crosslinks between the PAN blocks, following by decomposition of the PBA to create mesopores. Carbons prepared from brushes with longer PAN blocks exhibited higher surface areas, benefiting from more complete intermolecular crosslinking. Through careful adjustment of side-chain DP, carbons with surface area as high as 420 m(2)/g were obtained. Small mesopores (4-7 nm) with narrow size distributions, as well as significant nitrogen content (6-9 at. %), were observed. The brush-derived, nitrogen-doped mesoporous carbon was then deposited as a thin film on a glassy carbon electrode and demonstrated good electrocatalytic activity in the oxygen reduction reaction (ORR). (C) 2017 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据