4.5 Article

Positional isomers of mononuclear silver(I) anionic complex [Ag(Ph3P)2[B10H10-xClx]]- (x=0 or 1) with apically and equatorially coordinated decahydrido-closo-decaborate and 2-chlorononahydrido-closo-decaborate ligands

期刊

POLYHEDRON
卷 123, 期 -, 页码 396-403

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.poly.2016.12.009

关键词

Isomerism; Silver; Decahydrido-closo-decaborate anion; X-ray structure; Positional isomers; Boron hydrides

资金

  1. President of the Russian Federation within the Program in Support of Leading Scientific Schools [6541.2016.3]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Attempts to separate the two dianions [B-10-H-10](2-) and [B10H9Cl](2-) from mixtures with silver nitrate and PPh3 gave two novel compounds, [Ag(pph(3))(4)][Ag(pph(3))(2)B10H9.15Cl0.85]] (1) and [Ag(PPh3)(4)][Ag(PPh3)(2)[B10H9.5Cl0.5]] (2), instead. They were selectively prepared using different synthetic approaches: 1 was prepared by the reaction of a mixture of [B10H10](2-) and [B10H9Cl](2-) salts [Bu4N](2)[B10H10-xClx] (x = 0, 1) with AgNO3 followed by dissolution of the resulting precipitate in an acetonitrile solution in an excess of PPh3, whereas 2 was prepared by the reaction of the same mixture [Bu4N](2)[B10H10-xClx] with AgNO3 and an excess of PPh3 in a DMF solution. The X-ray diffraction studies showed that complex anions [Ag(Ph3P)(2)[B10H10-xClx]](-) in 1 and 2 are positional isomers with the 10 -vertex boron cluster ligands coordinating silver atoms by an apical and an equatorial edge, respectively. Crystals 1 and 2 are isostructural; in both, the anionic silver(I) complexes with [B10H10](2-) and [B10H9Cl](2-) cocrystallize in the same lattice. The chlorine substituents are not involved in silver coordination. Anionic complex in 2 provides the first example of silver(I) decahydrido-closo-decaborate with uncoordinated apical boron atoms of the boron cage. Possible mechanisms of the formation of complexes 1 and 2 are supposed. (C) 2016 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据