4.5 Article

Synthesis, crystal structures, EPR and DFT studies of first row transition metal complexes of lignin model compound ethylvanillin

期刊

POLYHEDRON
卷 121, 期 -, 页码 107-114

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.poly.2016.09.041

关键词

Transition metals; EPR; DFT; O-ligands; Coordination complex

资金

  1. CSIR, New Delhi, India [09/096(0586)/2009-EMR-I]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The transition metal complexes of ethylvanillin [Mn(L)(2)(H2O)(2)] (1), [Co(L)(2)(H2O)(2)] (2), [Ni(L)(2)(H2O)(2)] (3), and [Zn(L)(2)(H2O)(2)] (4) have been synthesized. The geometric and electronic structure of 1, 2, 3 and 4 has been solved by X-ray diffraction analysis and EPR spectroscopy. They are octahedral complexes with a cis arrangement of the two water molecules. All the structures were calculated by DFT methods at the level of theory B3P86/6-311g. The EPR spectra of I are isotropic both at 298 and 77 K with g values at 2.034 +/- 0.010 and 2.040 +/- 0.010, respectively indicating Mn(II) ion (3d(5)) with a S = 5/2 spin. 1 shows a hyperfine structure with six strong absorptions, corresponding to the vertical bar-1/2, m> -> vertical bar 1/2, m> 'allowed' transitions (Delta M = +/- 1, Delta m = 0), and five pairs of 'forbidden' absorptions (Delta M = +/- 1, Delta m = +/- 1), between the Delta m = 0 hyperfine transitions in an organic solvent such as DMF, DMSO and CH3CN. EPR spectroscopy and DFT calculations suggest that in the temperature range 77-298 K 2 presents a high-spin S = 3/2 state, whereas the low-spin state S = 1/2 begins to be populated at temperatures higher than 77 K (liquid nitrogen temperature). In 3, the weak signal due to a small amount of an octahedral Ni(III) complex (NiL3), is characterized by a rhombic spectrum. OFT simulations on 4 indicate that the octahedral structure with a cis arrangement of the two water ligands is more stable than the octahedral one with a trans arrangement and the tetrahedral geometry. (C) 2016 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据