4.6 Article

Impact of novel palmitoylated prolactin-releasing peptide analogs on metabolic changes in mice with diet-induced obesity

期刊

PLOS ONE
卷 12, 期 8, 页码 -

出版社

PUBLIC LIBRARY SCIENCE
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0183449

关键词

-

资金

  1. Grant Agency of the Czech Republic [15-08679S, 13-14105S]
  2. Operational Program Prague Competitiveness [CZ.2.16/3.1.00/24023]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Analogs of anorexigenic neuropeptides, such as prolactin-releasing peptide ( PrRP), have a potential as new anti-obesity drugs. In our previous study, palmitic acid attached to the N-erminus of PrRP enabled its central anorexigenic effects after peripheral administration. In this study, two linkers, gamma-glutamic acid at Lys(11) and a short, modified polyethylene glycol at the N-terminal Ser and/or Lys(11), were applied for the palmitoylation of PrRP31 to improve its bioavailability. These analogs had a high affinity and activation ability to the PrRP receptor GPR10 and the neuropeptide FF2 receptor, as well as short-term anorexigenic effect similar to PrRP palmitoylated at the N-terminus. Two-week treatment with analogs that were palmitoylated through linkers to Lys(11) (analogs 1 and 2), but not with analog modified both at the N-terminus and Lys(11) (analog 3) decreased body and liver weights, insulin, leptin, triglyceride, cholesterol and free fatty acid plasma levels in a mouse model of diet-induced obesity. Moreover, the expression of uncoupling protein-1 was increased in brown fat suggesting an increase in energy expenditure. In addition, treatment with analogs 1 and 2 but not analog 3 significantly decreased urinary concentrations of 1-methylnicotinamide and its oxidation products N-methyl-2-pyridone-5-carboxamide and N-methyl-4-pyridone-3-carboxamide, as shown by NMR-based metabolomics. This observation confirmed the previously reported increase in nicotinamide derivatives in obesity and type 2 diabetes mellitus and the effectiveness of analogs 1 and 2 in the treatment of these disorders.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据