4.3 Article

Resource conflict detection and removal strategy for nondeterministic emergency response processes using Petri nets

期刊

ENTERPRISE INFORMATION SYSTEMS
卷 10, 期 7, 页码 729-750

出版社

TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD
DOI: 10.1080/17517575.2014.986215

关键词

emergency response process; resource conflict detection; resource preparation time; priority-activity-first strategy; Petri nets; conflict-free net

资金

  1. National Natural Science foundation of China
  2. NSFC [61472229, 61170079, 61202152]
  3. Science & Technology Development Fund of Shandong Province [2014GGX101035, 2014BSB01020]
  4. Science & Technology Development Fund of Qingdao [13-1-4-153-jch, 2013-1-24]
  5. Taishan Scholar Climbing Program of Shandong Province of China
  6. Graduate Innovation Foundation Project of Shandong University of Science and Technology [YC140106]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Correctness of an emergency response process specification is critical to emergency mission success. Therefore, errors in the specification should be detected and corrected at build-time. In this paper, we propose a resource conflict detection approach and removal strategy for emergency response processes constrained by resources and time. In this kind of emergency response process, there are two timing functions representing the minimum and maximum execution time for each activity, respectively, and many activities require resources to be executed. Based on the RT_ERP_Net, the earliest time to start each activity and the ideal execution time of the process can be obtained. To detect and remove the resource conflicts in the process, the conflict detection algorithms and a priority-activity-first resolution strategy are given. In this way, real execution time for each activity is obtained and a conflict-free RT_ERP_Net is constructed by adding virtual activities. By experiments, it is proved that the resolution strategy proposed can shorten the execution time of the whole process to a great degree.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据