4.7 Article

Application of several non-linear prediction tools for estimating uniaxial compressive strength of granitic rocks and comparison of their performances

期刊

ENGINEERING WITH COMPUTERS
卷 32, 期 2, 页码 189-206

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s00366-015-0410-5

关键词

Uniaxial compressive strength; Granite; Non-linear multiple regression; Artificial neural network; Adaptive neuro-fuzzy inference system

资金

  1. Universiti Teknologi Malaysia

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Uniaxial compressive strength (UCS) of rock is crucial for any type of projects constructed in/on rock mass. The test that is conducted to measure the UCS of rock is expensive, time consuming and having sample restriction. For this reason, the UCS of rock may be estimated using simple rock tests such as point load index (I (s(50))), Schmidt hammer (R (n)) and p-wave velocity (V (p)) tests. To estimate the UCS of granitic rock as a function of relevant rock properties like R (n), p-wave and I (s(50)), the rock cores were collected from the face of the Pahang-Selangor fresh water tunnel in Malaysia. Afterwards, 124 samples are prepared and tested in accordance with relevant standards and the dataset is obtained. Further an established dataset is used for estimating the UCS of rock via three-nonlinear prediction tools, namely non-linear multiple regression (NLMR), artificial neural network (ANN) and adaptive neuro-fuzzy inference system (ANFIS). After conducting the mentioned models, considering several performance indices including coefficient of determination (R (2)), variance account for and root mean squared error and also using simple ranking procedure, the models were examined and the best prediction model was selected. It is concluded that the R (2) equal to 0.951 for testing dataset suggests the superiority of the ANFIS model, while these values are 0.651 and 0.886 for NLMR and ANN techniques, respectively. The results pointed out that the ANFIS model can be used for predicting UCS of rocks with higher capacity in comparison with others. However, the developed model may be useful at a preliminary stage of design; it should be used with caution and only for the specified rock types.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据