4.8 Article

Shish-Kebab-Structured Poly(ε-Caprolactone) Nanofibers Hierarchically Decorated with Chitosan Poly(ε-Caprolactone) Copolymers for Bone Tissue Engineering

期刊

ACS APPLIED MATERIALS & INTERFACES
卷 7, 期 12, 页码 6955-6965

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acsami.5b00900

关键词

poly(epsilon-caprolactone)(PCL); chitosan (CS); electrospinning; shish-kebab structure; tissue engineering

资金

  1. Wisconsin Institute for Discovery (WID)
  2. China Scholarship Council
  3. National Nature Science Foundation of China [51073061, 21174044]
  4. Guangdong Nature Science Foundation [S2013020013855, 9151064101000066]
  5. National Basic Research Development Program 973 of China [2012CB025902]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In this work, scaffolds with a shish-kebab (SK) structure formed by poly(epsilon-caprolactone) (PCL) nanofibers and chitosan-PCL (CS-PCL) copolymers were prepared via electrospinning and subsequent crystallization for bone tissue engineering applications. The aim of this study was to introduce nanosized topography and the high biocompatibility of chitosan onto PCL nanofibers to enhance cell affinity to PCL scaffolds. CS-PCL copolymers with various ratios were synthesized, and then spontaneously crystallized as kebabs onto the electrospun PCL fibers, which acted as shishes. Scanning electron microscopy (SEM) results demonstrated that the copolymer with PCL to chitosan ratio of 8.8 could hierarchically decorate the PCL nanofibers and formed well-shaped kebabs on the PCL nanofiber surface. Water contact angle tests and biomimetic activity experiments revealed that the shish-kebab scaffolds with CS-PCL kebabs (PCL-SK(CS-PCL8.8)) showed enhanced hydrophilicity and mineralization ability compared with smooth PCL and PCL-SK(PCL) shish-kebab scaffolds. Osteoblast-like MG63 cells cultured on the PCL-SK(CS-PCL8.8) scaffolds showed optimizing cell attachment, cell viability, and metabolic activity, demonstrating that this kind of scaffold has potential applications in bone tissue engineering.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据