4.7 Article

Strength, stiffness, resonance and the design of offshore wind turbine monopiles

期刊

ENGINEERING STRUCTURES
卷 100, 期 -, 页码 332-341

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.engstruct.2015.06.021

关键词

Offshore wind turbine; Monopile; Strength; Stiffness; Resonance avoidance; Operational; Extreme

资金

  1. US National Science Foundation [CMMI-1234560, CMMI-1234656]
  2. Massachusetts Clean Energy Center
  3. Div Of Civil, Mechanical, & Manufact Inn
  4. Directorate For Engineering [1234560] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

A monopile supporting an offshore wind turbine (OWT) is currently designed for both strength and stiffness. Regarding strength, the monopile is designed to have sufficient capacity to withstand demands under both 50-year operational conditions, when the rotor is spinning and blades are oriented to optimize power generation, and 50-year extreme conditions, when the rotor is parked and the blades feathered to minimize aerodynamic loads. Regarding stiffness, the monopile is designed to have sufficient stiffness such that the first structural frequency of the OWT falls between the 1P and 3P frequencies (rotation frequency and blade passing frequency for a three-bladed turbine). For six case studies, including three sites along the U.S. Atlantic coast and two mudline conditions (fixed and compliant), this paper delineates the conditions under which stiffness and strength govern the design of the monopile. This distinction has important implications for the overall risk profile of an OWT, as monopiles controlled by stiffness will have more reserve capacity than monopiles controlled by strength. The six case studies are intended to consider a range of water depths, metocean environments and mudline conditions that is representative of conditions suitable for installing OWTs supported by monopiles along the U.S. Atlantic coast. The monopile designs are controlled by stiffness for two of the six cases studies and, for these two cases, a modest (6-8%) reduction in monopile area (and mass) could be achieved if dynamic design requirements were achieved through means other than increasing monopile stiffness. Monopile designs for the remaining four cases are controlled by operational moment demands. (C) 2015 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据