4.6 Review

Taking stock of the social determinants of health: A scoping review

期刊

PLOS ONE
卷 12, 期 5, 页码 -

出版社

PUBLIC LIBRARY SCIENCE
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0177306

关键词

-

资金

  1. Alberta Innovates-Health Solutions Graduate Studentship
  2. Achievers in Medical Sciences recruitment scholarship from the University of Calgary
  3. Applied Public Health Chair - Canadian Institutes of Health Research (Institute of Population and Public Health
  4. Institute of Musculoskeletal Health and Arthritis)
  5. Public Health Agency of Canada
  6. Alberta Innovates D Health Solutions
  7. Canadian Institutes of Health Research
  8. Alberta Innovates - Health Solutions Graduate Studentship
  9. Alberta Innovates [201400593, 201400083] Funding Source: researchfish

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background In recent decades, the social determinants of health ( SDOH) has gained increasing prominence as a foundational concept for population and public health in academic literature and policy documents, internationally. However, alongside its widespread dissemination, and in light of multiple conceptual models, lists, and frameworks, some dilution and confusion is apparent. This scoping review represents an attempt to take stock of SDOH literature in the context of contemporary population and public health. Methods We conducted a scoping review to synthesize and map SDOH literature, informed by the methods of Arksey and O'Malley (2005). We searched 5 academic and 3 grey literature databases for social determinants of health and population health or public health or health promotion,published 2004-2014. We also conducted a search on inequity or inequality or disparity or social gradient and Canad* to ensure that we captured articles where this language was used to discuss the SDOH. We included articles that discussed SDOH in depth, either explicitly or in implicit but nuanced ways. We hand-searched reference lists to further identify relevant articles. Findings Our synthesis of 108 articles showed wide variation by study setting, target audience, and geographic scope, with most articles published in an academic setting, by Canadian authors, for policy-maker audiences. SDOH were communicated by authors as a list, model, or story; each with strengths and weaknesses. Thematic analysis identified one theme: health equity as an overarching and binding concept to the SDOH. Health equity was understood in different ways with implications for action on the SDOH. Conclusions Among the vast SDOH literature, there is a need to identify and clearly articulate the essence and implications of the SDOH concept. We recommend that authors be intentional in their efforts to present and discuss SDOH to ensure that they speak to its foundational concept of health equity.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据