4.7 Article

Bridge stress calculation based on the dynamic response of coupled train-bridge system

期刊

ENGINEERING STRUCTURES
卷 99, 期 -, 页码 334-345

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.engstruct.2015.04.014

关键词

Railway bridge; Train; Dynamic stress response; Train-bridge coupled dynamics; Finite element method; Direct stiffness method

资金

  1. State Fundamental Research Funds 973 Program [2013CB036203]
  2. Natural Science Foundation [51178025]
  3. 111 Project [B13002]
  4. Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities of China [C15JB00300]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Stress responses under vehicle loads are of great significance during the life-cycle of a bridge. The accurate identification of these responses is necessary for the bridge design, construction, assessment, maintenance, and rehabilitation. This paper presents a numerical approach for the stress analysis of railway bridges based on train-bridge coupled dynamics. A coupled train-bridge system model composed of a 3D vehicle model, a 3D bridge model established with the direct stiffness method, and an assumed wheel-rail contact relationship considering random excitations due to track irregularities, is developed. Based on the results of the train-bridge coupled analysis, bridge dynamic stress responses are then computed by elastic finite element method. The field measurement data of a 32 m simply-supported concrete bridge on a heavy haul railway is analyzed to validate the accuracy of the proposed approach. Additionally, the effect of two key parameters (i.e., the train speed and track irregularity) of the trainbridge coupled vibration analysis is discussed. The approach is illustrated on an existing railway steel bridge with low lateral stiffness. The stress time histories of bridge members are computed and compared to those obtained by using the moving concentrated load model, with an emphasis on the stress responses induced by lateral vibrations. (C) 2015 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据