Differences in words used to describe racial and gender groups in Medical Student Performance Evaluations

Purpose The transition from medical school to residency is a critical step in the careers of physicians. Because of the standardized application process-wherein schools submit summative Medical Student Performance Evaluations (MSPE's)-it also represents a unique opportunity to assess the possible prevalence of racial and gender disparities, as shown elsewhere in medicine. Method The authors conducted textual analysis of MSPE's from 6,000 US students applying to 16 residency programs at a single institution in 2014-15. They used custom software to extract demographic data and keyword frequency from each MSPE. The main outcome measure was the proportion of applicants described using 24 pre-determined words from four thematic categories (standout traits, ability, grindstone habits, and compassion). Results The data showed significant differences based on race and gender. White applicants were more likely to be described using standout or ability keywords (including exceptional, best, and outstanding) while Black applicants were more likely to be described as competent. These differences remained significant after controlling for United States Medical Licensing Examination Step 1 scores. Female applicants were more frequently described as caring, compassionate, and empathic or empathetic. Women were also more frequently described as bright and organized. Conclusions While the MSPE is intended to reflect an objective, summative assessment of students' qualifications, these data demonstrate for the first time systematic differences in how candidates are described based on racial/ethnic and gender group membership. Recognizing possible implicit biases and their potential impact is important for faculty who strive to create a more egalitarian medical community.