3.9 Article

Linear Pottery Culture sandstone supply strategies in north-western Europe: The example of macrolithic tool production in the Aisne Valley, France (late 6th millennium BCE)

期刊

JOURNAL OF ARCHAEOLOGICAL SCIENCE-REPORTS
卷 19, 期 -, 页码 301-311

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.jasrep.2018.02.049

关键词

Neolithic; Linear Pottery Culture (LBK); Quartzitic sandstones; Petrography; Mechanical properties; Macro-tools; Supply strategies

资金

  1. French Ministry of Culture: ATP Matieres premieres lithiques et societes protohistoriques dans le Nord de la France
  2. French Ministry of Culture: ACR L'implantation rubanee dans la vallee de l'Aisne
  3. French Ministry of Culture: PCR Economies et societes rubanees de la vallee de l'Aisne

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Among the new technologies that emerged in the Neolithic, the development of macrolithic implements was a key technological shift which accompanied the development of food processing (querns) and craft activities (e.g. polishers). Throughout the Early Neolithic of continental Europe (Linear Pottery Culture [LBK] contexts, 5500-4900 BCE), it has been observed that sandstones (sedimentary rocks) were virtually the only resource used for the production of macrolithic blanks. Our study focuses on a particularly well documented area of the Paris Basin, located along an 80 km stretch of the Aisne valley, which was intensively occupied by LBK populations. By combining regional and local approaches (based on geological maps and field surveys) to sedimentary sandstone sources and diversity on the one hand, and a technological analysis of macrolithic production on six LBK sites on the other, we have been able to correlate accessibility and quality of sandstones with specific raw material supply and management strategies developed by LBK populations. The high resolution model of mineral resource exploitation highlights how the dependence of Neolithic people on certain specific rocks led them to develop quite complex strategies for the production of macrolithic tools, even at a local scale.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

3.9
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据