4.7 Article

Remodelling of lace plant leaves: antioxidants and ROS are key regulators of programmed cell death

期刊

PLANTA
卷 246, 期 1, 页码 133-147

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s00425-017-2683-y

关键词

Anthocyanins; Antioxidant enzymes; Live cell imaging; Perforation development; Reactive oxygen species; Spectrophotometry

资金

  1. Sarah Lawson Research Scholarship
  2. Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada (NSERC) [121550, 45162]
  3. Canadian Foundation for Innovation (CFI) Leaders Opportunity Fund [14831]
  4. NSERC
  5. The Killam Trust

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Main conclusion Antioxidants and reactive oxygen species are integral for programmed cell death signaling during perforation formation in the lace plant (Aponogeton madagascariensis ). The lace plant is an excellent model system for studying developmentally regulated programmed cell death (PCD). During early lace plant leaf development, PCD systematically deletes cells resulting in a perforated leaf morphology that is unique in planta. A distinct feature in young lace plant leaves is an abundance of anthocyanins, which have antioxidant properties. The first sign of PCD induction is the loss of anthocyanin pigmentation in cells that are targeted for destruction, which results in a visible gradient of cell death. The cellular dynamics and time course of lace plant PCD are well documented; however, the signals involved in the pathway remain elusive. This study investigates the roles of antioxidants and ROS in developmental PCD signaling during lace plant perforation formation. The involvement of antioxidants and ROS in the pathway was determined using a variety of techniques including pharmacological whole plant experimentation, long-term live cell imaging, the 2,2'-azino-bis-3-ethylben-zothiazoline-6-sulfonic acid anti-radical activity assay, and western blot analysis. Results indicate that antioxidants and ROS are key regulators of PCD during the remodelling of lace plant leaves.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据