4.7 Article

Empirical estimation of strength of jointed rocks traversed by rock bolts based on experimental observation

期刊

ENGINEERING GEOLOGY
卷 197, 期 -, 页码 103-111

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.enggeo.2015.08.004

关键词

Jointed rock; Rock bolt; Uniaxial compression; Deere-Miller chart; Critical strain; Back analysis

资金

  1. Department of Science and Technology, New Delhi under NRDMS grant [DST-697-CED]
  2. DST

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Engineering behaviour of jointed rocks is substantially incompetent as compared to intact rocks due to the presence of joints. Rock bolts are routinely used to reinforce jointed rocks at project sites. The assessment of the strength behaviour of bolt-reinforced jointed rock is a challenging task due to the complex interaction between the joints and the bolts. The present paper attempts to resolve this issue through an experimental study. Natural rock cores with a natural joint, and synthetic rock cores with smooth joint have been tested under uniaxial compression. The tests have been performed on specimens without and with bolt. Grouted steel bolt was used to reinforce the rock, Results from the tests indicate that the provision of the bolt alters the failure mode of jointed rock, and enhances the strength and modulus values. Strength and modulus of the reinforced rock were found to be correlated with each other. It is proposed that the strength of reinforced rock can be obtained from strength and modulus of the intact rock and the modulus of the reinforced rock. The intact rock strength and modulus may be obtained from laboratory tests and the modulus of the reinforced rock may be obtained by back analysing the deformations observed in the field. Sakurai's critical strain concept has been analysed and it is observed that the correlations suggested through proposed empirical approach closely commensurate with critical strain approach and hence give scale free results. (C) 2015 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据