4.5 Article

Analysis of soil water content and crop yield after biochar application in field conditions

期刊

PLANT SOIL AND ENVIRONMENT
卷 63, 期 12, 页码 569-573

出版社

CZECH ACADEMY AGRICULTURAL SCIENCES
DOI: 10.17221/564/2017-PSE

关键词

climate change; biochar; Zea mays; Triticum aestivum; field measurements

类别

资金

  1. Slovak Research and Development Agency [APVV-0512-12]
  2. Scientific Grant Agency [VEGA 2/0013/15, VEGA 2/0189/17, VEGA 1/0604/16]
  3. Cultural and Educational Grant Agency [KEGA 026SPU-4/2017]
  4. Centre of Excellence for the Integrated River Basin Management in the Changing Environmental Conditions [ITMS 26220120062]
  5. Research and Development Operational Programme - ERDF

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Biochar has been studied extensively in terms of its influence on soil hydrophysical properties, but only small part of results was obtained from the field experiments. In this study, the soil water content was measured in 5-10 cm depth at experimental plots which received 20 t/ha and 0 t/ha (control) of biochar amendment at the Malanta area (Slovakia). The experimental area was cultivated with maize in 2015 and spring wheat in 2016. Our field measurements show that the positive effect of biochar amendment (20 t/ha) on soil water content is strongly related to the type of the crop grown and not straightforward. Unexpectedly, during the monitoring campaign in 2015 the soil water content of the biochar-amended soil was lower than control. In 2016, negligible differences were observed in soil water contents at both experimental plots, especially during the dry spells. However, higher soil water content was measured at the plot with biochar amendment after the series of precipitation events during the physiological maturity of the spring wheat. Moreover, the biochar amendment did not increase the biomass production and yields of maize in 2015, but it significantly increased the biomass production and yields of spring wheat in 2016.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据