4.7 Article

Salt responsive physiological, photosynthetic and biochemical attributes at early seedling stage for screening soybean genotypes

期刊

PLANT PHYSIOLOGY AND BIOCHEMISTRY
卷 118, 期 -, 页码 519-528

出版社

ELSEVIER FRANCE-EDITIONS SCIENTIFIQUES MEDICALES ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.plaphy.2017.07.013

关键词

Salt stress; Soybean; Principal component analysis; Alternative oxidase; K+/Na+ ratio; Gas exchange

资金

  1. Departmental Research and Development program
  2. SCUD, Savitribai Phule Pune University, Pune
  3. UGC DSA-I program of Government of India

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Salt stress affects all the stages of plant growth however seed germination and early seedling growth phases are more sensitive and can be used for screening of crop germplasm. In this study, we aimed to find the most effective indicators of salt tolerance for screening ten genotypes of soybean (SL-295, Gujosoya-2, PS-1042, PK-1029, ADT-1, RKS-18, KDS-344, MAUS-47, Bragg and PK-416). The principal component analysis (PCA) resulted in the formation of three different clusters, salt sensitive (SL-295, Gujosoya-2, PS-1042 and ADT-1), salt tolerant (MAUS-47, Bragg and PK-416) and moderately tolerant/sensitive (RIGS-18, PK-1029 and KDS-344) suggesting that there was considerable genetic variability for salt tolerance in the soybean genotypes. Subsequently, genotypes contrasting in salt tolerance were analyzed for their physiological traits, photosynthetic efficiency and mitochondrial respiration at seedling and early germination stages under different salt (NaCl) treatments. It was found that salt mediated increase in AOX-respiration, root and shoot K+/Na+ ratio, improved leaf area and water use efficiency were the key determinants of salinity tolerance, which could modulate the net photosynthesis (carbon assimilation) and growth parameters (carbon allocation). The results suggest that these biomarkers could be can be useful for screening soybean genotypes for salt tolerance. (C) 2017 Elsevier Masson SAS. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据