4.8 Article

Phylogeny-Based Systematization of Arabidopsis Proteins with Histone H1 Globular Domain

期刊

PLANT PHYSIOLOGY
卷 174, 期 1, 页码 27-34

出版社

OXFORD UNIV PRESS INC
DOI: 10.1104/pp.16.00214

关键词

-

资金

  1. European Cooperation in Science and Technology
  2. Ministry of Science and Higher Education [MNiSW 212/N-COST/2008/0]
  3. Foundation for Polish Science
  4. National Science Centre [2011/02/A/NZ2/00014, 2014/15/B/NZ1/03357, 2012/07/D/NZ2/04286]
  5. Ministry of Science and Higher Education
  6. Swiss National Science Foundation [31003A_149974/1]
  7. Swiss National Science Foundation (SNF) [31003A_149974] Funding Source: Swiss National Science Foundation (SNF)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

H1 (or linker) histones are basic nuclear proteins that possess an evolutionarily conserved nucleosome-binding globular domain, GH1. They perform critical functions in determining the accessibility of chromatin DNA to trans-acting factors. In most metazoan species studied so far, linker histones are highly heterogenous, with numerous nonallelic variants cooccurring in the same cells. The phylogenetic relationships among these variants as well as their structural and functional properties have been relatively well established. This contrasts markedly with the rather limited knowledge concerning the phylogeny and structural and functional roles of an unusually diverse group of GH1-containing proteins in plants. The dearth of information and the lack of a coherent phylogeny-based nomenclature of these proteins can lead to misunderstandings regarding their identity and possible relationships, thereby hampering plant chromatin research. Based on published data and our in silico and high-throughput analyses, we propose a systematization and coherent nomenclature of GH1-containing proteins of Arabidopsis ( Arabidopsis thaliana [L.] Heynh) that will be useful for both the identification and structural and functional characterization of homologous proteins from other plant species.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据