4.8 Article

Shoot Removal Induces Chloroplast Development in Roots via Cytokinin Signaling

期刊

PLANT PHYSIOLOGY
卷 173, 期 4, 页码 2340-2355

出版社

OXFORD UNIV PRESS INC
DOI: 10.1104/pp.16.01368

关键词

-

资金

  1. Japan Society for the Promotion of Science [JP24770055, JP26711016, JP24570042, JP16K07393]
  2. Grants-in-Aid for Scientific Research [26711016, 16J10176, 16K07393, 26291064] Funding Source: KAKEN

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The development of plant chloroplasts is regulated by various developmental, environmental, and hormonal cues. In Arabidopsis (Arabidopsis thaliana), chloroplast development is repressed in roots via auxin signaling. However, roots develop chloroplasts when they are detached from the shoot. In contrast to auxin, cytokinin positively affects chloroplast development in roots, but the role and signaling pathway of cytokinin in the root greening response remain unclear. To understand the regulatory pathways of chloroplast development in the plant stress response, we examined the mechanisms underlying the conditional greening of detached roots. In wild-type Arabidopsis roots, shoot removal activates type B ARABIDOPSIS RESPONSE REGULATOR (ARR)-mediated cytokinin signaling and induces chlorophyll accumulation and photosynthetic remodeling. ARR1 and ARR12 are essential for up-regulating nucleus- and plastid-encoded genes associated with chloroplast development in detached roots. In this process, WOUND INDUCED DEDIFFERENTIATION1 and class B GATA transcription factors (B-GATAs) act upstream and downstream of ARRs, respectively. Overexpression of B-GATAs promotes root greening, as does shoot removal, dependent on a light signaling transcription factor, LONG HYPOCOTYL5. Auxin represses the root greening response independent of ARR signaling. GNC-LIKE (GNL), a B-GATA, is strongly up-regulated in detached roots via ARR1 and ARR12 but is repressed by auxin, so GNL may function at the point of convergence of cytokinin and auxin signaling in the root greening response.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据