4.7 Article

Estimation of rate coefficients and branching ratios for gas-phase reactions of OH with aromatic organic compounds for use in automated mechanism construction

期刊

ATMOSPHERIC CHEMISTRY AND PHYSICS
卷 18, 期 13, 页码 9329-9349

出版社

COPERNICUS GESELLSCHAFT MBH
DOI: 10.5194/acp-18-9329-2018

关键词

-

资金

  1. Alliance of Automobile Manufacturers
  2. MAGNIFY project
  3. French National Research Agency (ANR) [ANR-14-CE01-0010]
  4. UK Natural Environment Research Council (NERC) [NE/M013448/1]
  5. UK National Centre for Atmospheric Sciences (NCAS) Composition Directorate
  6. NERC [NE/M013448/1] Funding Source: UKRI

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Reaction with the hydroxyl (OH) radical is the dominant removal process for volatile organic compounds (VOCs) in the atmosphere. Rate coefficients for the reactions of OH with VOCs are therefore essential parameters for chemical mechanisms used in chemistry transport models, and are required more generally for impact assessments involving estimation of atmospheric lifetimes or oxidation rates for VOCs. A structure-activity relationship (SAR) method is presented for the reactions of OH with aromatic organic compounds, with the reactions of aliphatic organic compounds considered in the preceding companion paper. The SAR is optimized using a preferred set of data including reactions of OH with 67 monocyclic aromatic hydrocarbons and oxygenated organic compounds. In each case, the rate coefficient is defined in terms of a summation of partial rate coefficients for H abstraction or OH addition at each relevant site in the given organic compound, so that the attack distribution is defined. The SAR can therefore guide the representation of the OH reactions in the next generation of explicit detailed chemical mechanisms. Rules governing the representation of the reactions of the product radicals under tropospheric conditions are also summarized, specifically the rapid reaction sequences initiated by their reactions with O-2.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据