4.6 Article

Li in Open Clusters: Cool Dwarfs in the Young, Subsolar-metallicity Cluster M35 (NGC 2168)

期刊

ASTRONOMICAL JOURNAL
卷 156, 期 1, 页码 -

出版社

IOP PUBLISHING LTD
DOI: 10.3847/1538-3881/aacb1f

关键词

open clusters and associations; individual (NGC 2168) - stars; abundances Supporting material; machine-readable tables

资金

  1. NSF [AST-1211621, AST-1211699]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Hydra spectra of 85 G-K dwarfs in the young cluster M35 near the Li 6708 A line region are analyzed. From velocities and Gaia astrometry, 78 are likely single-star members that, combined with previous work, produce 108 members with T-eff ranging from 6150 to 4000 K as defined by multicolor, broadband photometry, E (B - V) = 0.20, and [Fe/H] = -0.15, though there are indications the metallicity may be closer to solar. The Lithium abundance A(Li) follows a well-delineated decline from 3.15 for the hottest stars to upper limits <= 1.0 among the coolest dwarfs. Contrary to earlier work, M35 includes single stars at systematically higher A(Li) than the mean cluster relation. This subset exhibits higher V-ROT than the more Li-depleted sample and, from photometric rotation periods, is dominated by stars classed as convective (C); all others are interface (I) stars. The cool, high-Li rapid rotators (RRs) are consistent with models that simultaneously consider rapid rotation and radius inflation; RRs hotter than the Sun exhibit excess Li depletion, as predicted by the models. The A(Li) distribution with color and rotation period, when compared to the Hyades/Praesepe and the Pleiades, is consistent with gyrochronological analysis placing M35's age between the older M34 and younger Pleiades. However, the Pleiades display a more excessive range in A(Li) and rotation period than M35 on the low-Li, slow-rotation side of the distribution, with supposedly younger stars at a given T-eff in the Pleiades spinning slower, with A(Li) reduced by more than a factor of four compared to M35.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据