4.3 Article

Relationship between urine pH and abnormal glucose tolerance in a community-based study

期刊

JOURNAL OF DIABETES INVESTIGATION
卷 9, 期 4, 页码 769-775

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/jdi.12777

关键词

Glucose intolerant; pH; Urine

资金

  1. Ehime University

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Aims/IntroductionThe association between urine pH and abnormal glucose tolerance in men and women is unclear; therefore, we carried out a community-based, cross-sectional study to investigate sex-specific associations between these values, possible indicators of prediabetes and type2 diabetes. Materials and MethodsWe enrolled 4,945 Japanese individuals (2,490 men and 2,455 women), who had undergone annual health checkups. To investigate the relationship between low urine pH and abnormal glucose tolerance, participants were divided into three groups based on their fasting plasma glucose levels (<6.11mmol/L, 6.11-6.99 mmol/L and 6.99mmol/L), and three groups based on their glycated hemoglobin levels (44.3mmol/mol, 44.3-47.5mmol/mol and 47.5mmol/mol). To examine the effects of urine pH on abnormal glucose tolerance, participants were categorized into five groups based on their urine pH (5.0, 5.5, 6.0, 6.5 and 7.0). ResultsMultivariate analysis adjusted for age, body mass index, systolic blood pressure, triglycerides, high-density lipoprotein cholesterol, uric acid, creatinine and antidiabetic agent use showed significant associations between low urine pH and both high fasting plasma glucose and high glycated hemoglobin levels (P for trend=0.0260, 0.0075) in men. Furthermore, after the same adjustments, prevalence rates of abnormal glucose tolerance (6.11mmol/L and 6.99mmol/L), increased significantly as urine pH levels decreased (P for trend=0.0483, 0.0181) in men. In women, a similar trend was observed without a significant difference. ConclusionsLow urine pH is significantly associated with abnormal glucose tolerance; therefore, measuring urine pH might prove useful for identifying patients at high risk for diabetes.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据