4.8 Article

Largely additive effects of gibberellin and strigolactone on gene expression in Arabidopsis thaliana seedlings

期刊

PLANT JOURNAL
卷 92, 期 5, 页码 924-938

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/tpj.13729

关键词

Arabidopsis thaliana; DELLA; gibberellin; GR24; strigolactone; transcriptomics

资金

  1. Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft [SFB924]
  2. Federal Ministry of Education and Research (PLANT-KBBE IV: DELLA-STRESS)
  3. German-Israeli Foundation for Scientific Research and Development [I-1313-203.13/2015]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The phytohormones gibberellin (GA) and strigolactone (SL) are involved in essential processes in plant development. Both GA and SL signal transduction mechanisms employ alpha/beta-hydrolase-derived receptors that confer E3 ubiquitin ligase-mediated protein degradation processes. This suggests a common evolutionary origin of these pathways and possibly a molecular interaction between them. One such indication stems from rice, where the DELLA protein of the GA pathway was reported to interact with the SL receptor. Here, we examine the physiological interaction between both pathways through the analysis of GA (ga1) and SL biosynthesis (max1 and max3) mutants. In ga1 max double mutants, we find indications only for additive interactions when examining several phenotypic readouts. We further identify short-term transcriptional responses to GA and the synthetic SL rac-GR24 through next-generation sequencing of poly-adenylated RNAs (RNA-seq) in ga1 max1. Remarkably, both hormones lead to predominantly additive transcriptional changes of a largely overlapping set of genes. The expression of only a few genes was altered in a synergistic manner but, interestingly, these include the genes encoding the GA catabolic enzyme GA2 OXIDASE2 (GA2ox2) as well as the SL pathway regulators BRANCHED1 (BRC1) and SUPPRESSOR OF max2 1-LIKE8 (SMXL8). We conclude that GA and rac-GR24 signaling in Arabidopsis seedlings converge at the level of transcription of a common gene-set.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据