4.7 Article

HOP3, a member of the HOP family in Arabidopsis, interacts with BiP and plays a major role in the ER stress response

期刊

PLANT CELL AND ENVIRONMENT
卷 40, 期 8, 页码 1341-1355

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/pce.12927

关键词

cochaperone; DTT; HSP70-HSP90; pollen germination; TUDCA; tunicamycin; UPR

资金

  1. European Research Council under the European Union's Seventh Framework Programme/ERC [260468]
  2. [RTA2013-00027-00-00]
  3. [S2013-ABI2748]
  4. European Research Council (ERC) [260468] Funding Source: European Research Council (ERC)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

HSP70-HSP90 organizing protein (HOP) is a well-studied family of cytosolic cochaperones. However, the possible role of HOP during the endoplasmic reticulum (ER) stress response and the identity of its interactors within the ER were not previously addressed in any eukaryote. We have demonstrated that Arabidopsis HOP3, whose function was not studied before, interacts in vivo with cytosolic HSP90 and HSP70, and, unexpectedly, with binding immunoglobulin protein (BiP), a HSP70 ER-resident protein. Although BiP lacks the domain described in other eukaryotes for HOP-HSP70 binding, it interacts with HOP3 through a non-canonical association to its nucleotide binding domain. Consistent with this interaction with BiP, HOP3 is partially localized at the ER. Moreover, HOP3 is induced both at transcript and protein levels by unfolded protein response (UPR) inducer agents by a mechanism dependent on inositol-requiring enzyme 1 (IRE1). Importantly, hop3 loss-of-function mutants show a reduction in pollen germination and a hypersensitive phenotype in the presence of ER stress inducer agents, a phenotype that is reverted by the addition of the chemical chaperone tauroursodeoxycholic acid (TUDCA). All these data demonstrate, for the first time in any eukaryote, a main role of HOP as an important regulator of the ER stress response, a process intimately linked in plants to important specific developmental programs and to environmental stress sensing and response.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据