4.8 Article

Differentially Regulated Orthologs in Sorghum and the Subgenomes of Maize

期刊

PLANT CELL
卷 29, 期 8, 页码 1938-1951

出版社

AMER SOC PLANT BIOLOGISTS
DOI: 10.1105/tpc.17.00354

关键词

-

资金

  1. National Institute of Food and Agriculture, U.S. Department of Agriculture [16-67013-24613]
  2. National Science Foundation [OIA-1557417]
  3. University of Nebraska-Lincoln
  4. Office of Integrative Activities [1557417] Funding Source: National Science Foundation
  5. Office Of The Director [1557417] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Identifying interspecies changes in gene regulation, one of the two primary sources of phenotypic variation, is challenging on a genome-wide scale. The use of paired time-course data on cold-responsive gene expression in maize (Zea mays) and sorghum (Sorghum bicolor) allowed us to identify differentially regulated orthologs. While the majority of cold-responsive transcriptional regulation of conserved gene pairs is species specific, the initial transcriptional responses to cold appear to be more conserved than later responses. In maize, the promoters of genes with conserved transcriptional responses to cold tend to contain more micrococcal nuclease hypersensitive sites in their promoters, a proxy for open chromatin. Genes with conserved patterns of transcriptional regulation between the two species show lower ratios of nonsynonymous to synonymous substitutions. Genes involved in lipid metabolism, known to be involved in cold acclimation, tended to show consistent regulation in both species. Genes with species-specific cold responses did not cluster in particular pathways nor were they enriched in particular functional categories. We propose that cold-responsive transcriptional regulation in individual species may not be a reliable marker for function, while a core set of genes involved in perceiving and responding to cold stress are subject to functionally constrained cold-responsive regulation across the grass tribe Andropogoneae.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据