4.7 Article

Long noncoding RNAs involve in resistance to Verticillium dahliae, a fungal disease in cotton

期刊

PLANT BIOTECHNOLOGY JOURNAL
卷 16, 期 6, 页码 1172-1185

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/pbi.12861

关键词

cotton; lncRNA; Verticillium dahliae; genomewide expression profile; virus-induced gene silencing; broad resistance

资金

  1. International Science & Technology Cooperation Program of China [2015DFA30860]
  2. China Agricultural Research System [CARS-18-09]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Long noncoding RNAs (lncRNAs) have several known functions in plant development, but their possible roles in responding to plant disease remain largely unresolved. In this study, we described a comprehensive disease-responding lncRNA profiles in defence against a cotton fungal disease Verticillium dahliae. We further revealed the conserved and specific characters of disease-responding process between two cotton species. Conservatively for two cotton species, we found the expression dominance of induced lncRNAs in the Dt subgenome, indicating a biased induction pattern in the co-existing subgenomes of allotetraploid cotton. Comparative analysis of lncRNA expression and their proposed functions in resistant Gossypium barbadense cv. '7124' versus susceptible Gossypium hirsutum cv. 'YZ1' revealed their distinct disease response mechanisms. Species-specific (LS) lncRNAs containing more SNPs displayed a fiercer inducing level postinfection than the species-conserved (core) lncRNAs. Gene Ontology enrichment of LS lncRNAs and core lncRNAs indicates distinct roles in the process of biotic stimulus. Further functional analysis showed that two core lncRNAs, GhlncNAT-ANX2- and GhlncNAT-RLP7-silenced seedlings, displayed an enhanced resistance towards V. dahliae and Botrytis cinerea, possibly associated with the increased expression of LOX1 and LOX2. This study represents the first characterization of lncRNAs involved in resistance to fungal disease and provides new clues to elucidate cotton disease response mechanism.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据