4.7 Review

Opportunities for mobilizing recalcitrant phosphorus from agricultural soils: a review

期刊

PLANT AND SOIL
卷 427, 期 1-2, 页码 5-16

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s11104-017-3362-2

关键词

Phosphorus; Organic phosphorus; Soil; Crops; Fertilizer; Plant nutrition

资金

  1. Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council (BBSRC) responsive mode grant in the UK [BB/K018167/1]
  2. BBSRC [BB/L026309/1, BBS/E/C/00005197, BB/K018795/1, BB/K017047/1, BB/K018167/1, BBS/E/C/000I0320] Funding Source: UKRI
  3. Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council [BB/K018795/1, BB/K017047/1, BB/K018167/1, BB/L026309/1, BBS/E/C/000I0320, BBS/E/C/00005197] Funding Source: researchfish

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Phosphorus (P) fertilizer is usually applied in excess of plant requirement and accumulates in soils due to its strong adsorption, rapid precipitation and immobilisation into unavailable forms including organic moieties. As soils are complex and diverse chemical, biochemical and biological systems, strategies to access recalcitrant soil P are often inefficient, case specific and inconsistently applicable in different soils. Finding a near-universal or at least widely applicable solution to the inefficiency in agricultural P use by plants is an important unsolved problem that has been under investigation for more than half a century. In this paper we critically review the strategies proposed for the remobilization of recalcitrant soil phosphorus for crops and pastures worldwide. We have additionally performed a meta-analysis of available soil P-31-NMR data to establish the potential agronomic value of different stored P forms in agricultural soils. Soil inorganic P stocks accounted on average for 1006 +/- 115 kg ha(-1) (57 +/- 7%), while the monoester P pool accounted for 587 +/- 32 kg ha(-1) (33 +/- 2%), indicating the huge potential for the future agronomic use of the soil legacy P. New impact driven research is needed in order to create solutions for the sustainable management of soil P stocks.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据