4.7 Article

Transcriptomic and Metabolomic Reprogramming from Roots to Haustoria in the Parasitic Plant, Thesium chinense

期刊

PLANT AND CELL PHYSIOLOGY
卷 59, 期 4, 页码 729-738

出版社

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1093/pcp/pcx200

关键词

Developmental reprogramming; Haustorium; Metabolome; Parasitic plants; Thesium chinense; Transcriptome

资金

  1. RIKEN Special Postdoctoral Researchers Program
  2. Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology, Japan [15K18589]
  3. Japan Science and Technology Agency (JST) [PRESTO] [JPMJPR15Q2]
  4. KAKENHI [15H05959, 17H06172]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Most plants show remarkable developmental plasticity in the generation of diverse types of new organs upon external stimuli, allowing them to adapt to their environment. Haustorial formation in parasitic plants is an example of such developmental reprogramming, but its molecular mechanism is largely unknown. In this study, we performed field-omics using transcriptomics and metabolomics to profile the molecular switch occurring in haustorial formation of the root parasitic plant, Thesium chinense, collected from its natural habitat. RNA-sequencing with de novo assembly revealed that the transcripts of very long chain fatty acid (VLCFA) biosynthesis genes, auxin biosynthesis/signaling-related genes and lateral root developmental genes are highly abundant in the haustoria. Gene co-expression network analysis identified a network module linking VLCFAs and the auxin-responsive lateral root development pathway. GC-TOF-MS analysis consistently revealed a unique metabolome profile with many types of fatty acids in the T. chinense root system, including the accumulation of a 25-carbon long chain saturated fatty acid in the haustoria. Our field-omics data provide evidence supporting the hypothesis that the molecular developmental machinery used for lateral root formation in non-parasitic plants has been co-opted into the developmental reprogramming of haustorial formation in the linage of parasitic plants.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据