4.5 Article

Regulation of cell proliferation in the retinal pigment epithelium: Differential regulation of the death-associated protein like-1 DAPL1 by alternative MITF splice forms

期刊

PIGMENT CELL & MELANOMA RESEARCH
卷 31, 期 3, 页码 411-422

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/pcmr.12676

关键词

age-related macular degeneration; alternative splicing; MITF; pigment cell; retinal pigment epithelium

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [81570892, 81600748, 81770946]
  2. Medical Scientific Research Foundation of Zhejiang Province, China [2016KYB205, 2017KY487]
  3. Wenzhou public welfare project [Y20160054]
  4. Zhejiang Provincial NSF [LQ16C070001]
  5. Research Grant of Wenzhou Medical University
  6. Research Grant of Wenzhou Medical University Eye Hospital [KYQD151211, KYQD130301, YNZD201605]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Vertebrate eye development and homoeostasis critically depend on the regulation of proliferation of cells forming the retinal pigment epithelium (RPE). Previous results indicated that the death-associated protein like-1 DAPL1 cell autonomously suppresses RPE proliferation in vivo and in vitro. Here, we show in human RPE cell lines that the pigment cell transcription factor MITF regulates RPE cell proliferation by upregulating DAPL1 expression. DAPL1 regulation by MITE is, however, mediated predominantly by (-) MITF, one of two alternative splice isoforms of MITF that lacks six residues located upstream of the DNA-binding basic domain. Furthermore, we find that the regulation of DAPL1 by MITE is indirect in that (-) MITE stimulates the transcription of Musashi homolog-2 (MS12), which negatively regulates the processing of the anti-DAPL1 microRNA miR-7. Our results provide molecular insights into the regulation of RPE cell proliferation and quiescence and may help us understand the mechanisms of normal RPE maintenance and of eye diseases associated with either RPE hyperproliferation or the lack of regenerative proliferation.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据