4.7 Article

Inhibitory effect of sulphated polysaccharide porphyran (isolated from Porphyra yezoensis) on RANKL-induced differentiation of RAW264.7 cells into osteoclasts

期刊

PHYTOTHERAPY RESEARCH
卷 32, 期 3, 页码 452-458

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/ptr.5988

关键词

osteoclast; Porphyra yezoensis; porphyran; RANKL; RAW264; 7 cells

资金

  1. Japan Society for the Promotion of Science (JSPS) [14J00356]
  2. Nagasaki University Major Research Project (Research Initiative for Adaptation to Future Ocean Change)
  3. National Research Foundation of Korea [NRF-2017R1A2B4005582]
  4. Korea Basic Science Institute [C37230]
  5. Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology of Japan [15K07580]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Safe and efficient therapeutic agents for bone diseases are required in natural sources. We previously found that edible seaweed-derived polysaccharide porphyran exhibited anti-inflammatory effects through the down regulation of nuclear factor-B. The aim of this study was to investigate the availability of porphyran as a therapeutic agent for bone diseases. The effects of porphyran on receptor activator of nuclear factor B ligand (RANKL)-induced osteoclastogenesis in RAW264.7 cells were examined. Porphyran suppressed RANKL-induced osteoclast formation in a concentration-dependent manner (6.25-50g/ml) without any cytotoxic effects. Furthermore, real-time polymerase chain reaction analyses indicated that porphyran at 50g/ml significantly attenuated the RANKL-induced increase in the mRNA levels of osteoclastogenesis-related marker genes such as nuclear factor of activated T cells, tartrate-resistant acid phosphatase, cathepsin K, and matrix metalloproteinase-9 in RAW264.7 cells. To our knowledge, this is the first report showing that edible-seaweed-derived polysaccharide porphyran can suppress RANKL-induced osteoclastogenesis. Our results suggest that porphyran can be used as a safe therapeutic agent to improve osteoclast-related pathological conditions.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据