4.5 Article

Toward an energy measurement of the internal conversion electron in the deexcitation of the 229Th isomer

期刊

PHYSICAL REVIEW C
卷 98, 期 1, 页码 -

出版社

AMER PHYSICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevC.98.014317

关键词

-

资金

  1. European Union's Horizon 2020 research and innovation programme [664732]
  2. Austrian Science Foundation FWF [F41]
  3. WWTF [MA16-066]
  4. JSPS KAKENHI [25800150, 16J06700]
  5. Austrian Science Fund (FWF) [F41] Funding Source: Austrian Science Fund (FWF)
  6. Grants-in-Aid for Scientific Research [16J06700, 25800150] Funding Source: KAKEN

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The first excited isomeric state of Th-229 has an exceptionally low energy of only a few eV and could form the gateway to high-precision laser spectroscopy of nuclei. The excitation energy of the isomeric state has been inferred from precision gamma spectroscopy, but its uncertainty is still too large to commence laser spectroscopy. Reducing this uncertainty is one of the most pressing challenges in the field. Here we present an approach to infer the energy of the isomer from spectroscopy of the electron which is emitted when the isomer de-excites through internal conversion (IC). The experiment builds on U-233, which alpha-decays to Th-229 and populates the isomeric state with a 2% branching ratio. A film of U-233 is covered by a stopping layer of few-nm thickness and placed between an alpha detector and an electron detector, such that the alpha particle and the IC electron can be detected in coincidence. Retarding field electrodes allow for an energy measurement. In the present design, the signal of the Th-229m IC electrons is masked by low-energy electrons emitted from the surface of the metallic stopping layer. We perform reference measurements with U-232 and U-234 to study systematic effects, and we study various means to reduce the background of low-energy electrons. Our study gives guidelines to the design of an experiment that is capable of detecting the IC electrons and measuring the isomer energy.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据