4.5 Article

Emergence of Resistance to Fungicides: The Role of Fungicide Dose

期刊

PHYTOPATHOLOGY
卷 107, 期 5, 页码 545-560

出版社

AMER PHYTOPATHOLOGICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1094/PHYTO-08-16-0297-R

关键词

disease control; epidemiology; fungicide resistance; host-pathogen interaction; infectious disease; mathematical model; plant pathogens

资金

  1. ERC [PBDR 268540]
  2. Swiss National Science Foundation [PZOOP3_161453]
  3. Biotechnology and Biological Research Council (BBSRC) of the U.K.
  4. BBSRC [BB/K020900/1] Funding Source: UKRI
  5. Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council [BBS/OS/CP/000001, BB/K020900/1] Funding Source: researchfish

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Resistance to antimicrobial drugs allows pathogens to survive drug treatment. The time taken for a new resistant mutant to reach a population size that is unlikely to die out by chance is called emergence time. Prolonging emergence time would delay loss of control. We investigate the effect of fungicide dose on the emergence time in fungal plant pathogens. A population dynamical model is combined with dose response data for Zymoseptoria tritici, an important wheat pathogen. Fungicides suppress sensitive pathogen population. This has two effects. First, the rate of appearance of resistant mutants is reduced, hence the emergence takes longer. Second, more healthy host tissue becomes available for resistant mutants, increasing their chances to invade and accelerates emergence. In theory, the two competing effects may lead to a non-monotonic dependence of the emergence time on fungicide dose that exhibits a minimum. But according to field data, fungicides are unable to reduce the fungicide-sensitive population strongly enough even at high doses. Hence, for full resistance over realistic ranges of pathogen's life history and fungicide dose-response parameters, emergence time decreases monotonically with increasing dose. For partial resistance, there can be cases within a limited parameter range, when emergence decelerates at higher doses.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据