4.7 Article

Oxidation of monoterpenes in Protium heptaphyllum oleoresins

期刊

PHYTOCHEMISTRY
卷 136, 期 -, 页码 141-146

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.phytochem.2017.01.013

关键词

Protium heptaphyllum; Burseraceae; Terpinolene; p-Cymene; p-Cymen-8-ol; Monoterpene oxidation; Genome; Multivariate analysis

资金

  1. FAPERJ [E-26/110.727/2013 - APQ1]
  2. PIBIC/UFRJ

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Protium heptaphyllum (Burseraceae) oleoresins are rich in volatile monoterpenes, exhibiting a chemical composition that can be strongly altered with time. The present work aimed to discuss the temporal change of the volatile composition of these oleoresins, and search for related supporting evidence. Samples Of P. heptaphyllum oleoresin were collected separately for fresh (n = 10) and aged (n = 8) oleoresins, with the essential oils obtained by hydrodistillation analyzed by GC-FID and GC-MS. Fresh oleoresins were characterized by a high content of terpinolene (28.2-69.7%), whereas aged ones contained large amounts of p-cymene (18.7-43.0%) and p-cymen-8-ol (8.2-31.8%). Multivariate analyses were performed based on the yield and major essential oil components to clearly demonstrate the existence of two subsets (fresh and aged oleoresins). In addition, an analysis of the partial genome sequencing of the species was carried out, producing the largest amount of data for the genus Protium. Subsequently, were searched for nucleotide sequences responsible for the enzymes involved in the biosynthesis of monoterpenes. Two hypotheses were formulated to understand the oxidation process during aging of the oleoresins: (i) a natural chemical oxidation of terpenes and (ii) an oxidation catalyzed by enzymes produced by microorganisms associated with the plant. The results suggested that terpinolene was most likely oxidized to p-cymene, which, in turn, was oxidized into p-cymen-8-ol during natural aging of the exudate due to abiotic factors. (C) 2017 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据