3.8 Article

Hybrid Scaffolds of Hyaluronic Acid and Collagen Loaded with Prednisolone: an Interesting System for Osteoarthritis

期刊

ADVANCED PHARMACEUTICAL BULLETIN
卷 8, 期 1, 页码 11-19

出版社

TABRIZ UNIV MEDICAL SCIENCES & HEALTH SERVICES
DOI: 10.15171/apb.2018.002

关键词

Scaffold; Hyaluronic acid; Collagen; Implantable disk; Thermo-sensitive gel; Cartilage regeneration

资金

  1. Shiraz University of Medical Sciences [94-7585]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Purpose: Cartilage regeneration by using polymeric scaffolds is a new option for treatment of osteoarthritis. A good scaffold for tissue engineering should copy the characteristics of natural extracellular matrix. The purpose of this study was to make a dosage form with proper reliability and stability for cartilage repair. Methods: Hybrid scaffolds containing different ratios of hyaluronic acid (HA) and collagen were prepared and loaded with prednisolone as anti-inflammatory agent. Two different dosage forms (lyophilized implantable disk and thermo-sensitive gels) were examined. A scaffold of cross-linked HA was used as control. Different characterization tests were considered including differential scanning calorimetry (DSC), scanning electron microscopy, mechanical evaluations, and drug release. Results: The physical and chemical performance of hybrid-scaffolds was better than HA scaffold. Increasing the concentration of HA and collagen improved the physical and chemical characteristics Regarding the mechanical properties of the hybrid scaffold, the pore size was 20-200 mu m, compressive modulus was 54.77 +/- 0.31 kPa, more than 1200% water uptake was observed after 4 days, gelation temperature was 32 +/- 0.16 degrees C, gelation time was 2.4 +/- 0.1 min, and drug release was controlled for 5 days by Higuchi release kinetic model. Conclusion: It seems that this porous hybrid scaffold could be a suitable choice in cartilage regeneration as well as a controlled-release system for delivery of prednisolone in osteoarthritis.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

3.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据