3.8 Article

Guidelines for Gait Assessments in the Canadian Consortium on Neurodegeneration in Aging (CCNA)

期刊

CANADIAN GERIATRICS JOURNAL
卷 21, 期 2, 页码 157-165

出版社

MULTIMED INC
DOI: 10.5770/cgj.21.298

关键词

consensus; gait; cognition; aging; neurodegenerative diseases

资金

  1. Canadian Consortium on Neurodegeneration in Aging (CCNA) from the Canadian Institutes of Health Research [FRN CNA 137794]
  2. Gait and Brain Lab, Parkwood Institute, University of Western Ontario
  3. Lawson Health Research Institute through the Early Research Award of Ontario

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background Motor and cognitive impairments are common among older adults and often co-exist, increasing their risk of dementia, falls, and fractures. Gait performance is an accepted indicator of global health and it has been proposed as a valid motor marker to detect older adults at risk of developing mobility and cognitive declines including future falls and incident dementia. Our goal was to provide a gait assessment protocol to be used for clinical and research purposes. Methods Based on a consensus that identified common evaluations to assess motor-cognitive interactions in community-dwelling older individuals, a protocol on how to evaluate gait in older adults for the Canadian Consortium on Neurodegeneration in Aging (CCNA) was developed. Results The CCNA gait assessment includes preferred and fast pace gait, and dual-task gait that comprises walking while performing three cognitively demanding tasks: counting backwards by ones, counting backwards by sevens, and naming animals. This gait protocol can be implemented using an electronic-walkway, as well as by using a regular stopwatch. The latter approach provides a simple manner to evaluate quantitative gait performance in clinics. Conclusions Establishing a standardized gait assessment protocol will help to assess motor-cognitive interactions in aging and neurodegeneration, to compare results across studies, and to feasibly implement and translate gait testing in clinics for detecting impending cognitive and mobility decline.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

3.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据