4.7 Article

Influence of a large-eddy breakup device on the frictional drag in a turbulent boundary layer

期刊

PHYSICS OF FLUIDS
卷 29, 期 6, 页码 -

出版社

AMER INST PHYSICS
DOI: 10.1063/1.4984602

关键词

-

资金

  1. Creative Research Initiatives program of the National Research Foundation (MSIP) [2017-013369]
  2. National Research Foundation of Korea [2009-0081572] Funding Source: Korea Institute of Science & Technology Information (KISTI), National Science & Technology Information Service (NTIS)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

A direct numerical simulation of a spatially developing turbulent boundary layer with a large-eddy breakup (LEBU) device was performed to investigate the influence of the LEBU device on the nearwall turbulence and frictional drag. The LEBU device, which is thin and rectangular in shape, was located at 80% of the boundary layer thickness (delta). The LEBU device reduced the skin-friction coefficient (C-f) up to 17%. The breakdown of the outer structures passing through the LEBU device reduced the energy of the long wavelength motions ( lambda(z) (+) > 200) along the wall-normal direction. The reduction of C-f mainly arose from the contribution of the Reynolds shear stress by the difference in the spatial coherence of the outer high-and low-speed structures. We investigated the relationship between the large-scale motions and the velocity-vorticity correlations (< nu omega(z)> and <-w omega(y)>), which directly contribute to C-f. The contributions of < v omega(z)> and <-w omega(y)> accounted for 80% of the total C-f reduction. The amount of the Cf reduction induced by vortex stretching arose from the contributions of the intense positive u(L) ( u(L)(+) approximate to 2) and the relatively weak negative u(L) (u(L)(+) approximate to 0.7). Owing to the negative contribution of the advective vorticity transport, the total C-f reduction was obtained under the negative u(L) even though drag reduction was achieved by the suppression of vortex stretching under the intense positive u(L).

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据